Findings on happiness in Wun'gaen et al. (2017): study TH 2016

Publication
Author(s)Wun'gaen, S.; Jumnianpol, S.; Nuangjamnong, N.
TitleSocial Well-Being in Thailand 2016: Survey Report.
SourceThe Senshu Social Well-Being Review, 2017, Nr. 4, 75 - 83
Investigation
PublicAdults, age range not reported, Thailand, 2016
Survey nameUnnamed study
 Own survey: Social well-being study of Thailand
SampleProbability multistage stratified area sample
Respondents N =1114
Non ResponseNot available
AssesmentInterview: face-to-face
Happiness measure(s) used
Full textSelfreport on single question: .. Life satisfaction.. (full; text not reported) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labels of scale extremes not reported
ClassificationO-SL?-?-sq-n-11-f
Author's labelSocial well-being
Page in publication80-83
RemarksMarrieds only
Finding used in
nation ranks
Yes
 On original range 0 - 10On range 0 - 10
Mean8.65
Standard deviation


Full textSelfreport on single question: Here is a picture of a ladder. Suppose we say that the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom represents the worst possible life for you. Where on the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time? [ 10 ] best possible life [ 9 ] [ 8 ] [ 7 ] [ 6 ] [ 5 ] [ 4 ] [ 3 ] [ 2 ] [ 1 ] [ 0 ] worst possible life Preceded by 1) open questions about what the respondent imagines as the best possible life and the worst possible life. 2) ratings on the ladder of one's life five years ago and where on the ladder one expects to stand five years from now. Name: Cantril's self anchoring ladder rating of life (original)
ClassificationC-BW-c-sq-l-11-a
Author's labelSocial well-being
Page in publication85-86
Finding used in
nation ranks
Yes
 On original range 0 - 10On range 0 - 10
Mean7.29
Standard deviation


Correlational findings

Author's labelSubject Code
Finding
Subject description
GenderG01aaSex (male vs female)
Urban/ruralL13ab02bRural vs urban dwelling