Publication | |
Author(s) | Wun'gaen, S.; Jumnianpol, S.; Nuangjamnong, N. |
Title | Social Well-Being in Thailand 2016: Survey Report. |
Source | The Senshu Social Well-Being Review, 2017, Nr. 4, 75 - 83 |
Investigation | |
Public | Adults, age range not reported, Thailand, 2016 |
Survey name | Unnamed study |
Own survey: Social well-being study of Thailand | |
Sample | Probability multistage stratified area sample |
Respondents N = | 1114 |
Non Response | Not available |
Assesment | Interview: face-to-face |
Happiness measure(s) used |
Full text | Selfreport on single question: .. Life satisfaction.. (full; text not reported) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Labels of scale extremes not reported |
Classification | O-SL?-?-sq-n-11-f |
Author's label | Social well-being |
Page in publication | 80-83 |
Remarks | Marrieds only |
Finding used in nation ranks | Yes |
On original range 0 - 10 | On range 0 - 10 | |
Mean | 8.65 | |
Standard deviation |
Full text | Selfreport on single question: Here is a picture of a ladder. Suppose we say that the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom represents the worst possible life for you. Where on the ladder do you feel you personally stand at the present time? [ 10 ] best possible life [ 9 ] [ 8 ] [ 7 ] [ 6 ] [ 5 ] [ 4 ] [ 3 ] [ 2 ] [ 1 ] [ 0 ] worst possible life Preceded by 1) open questions about what the respondent imagines as the best possible life and the worst possible life. 2) ratings on the ladder of one's life five years ago and where on the ladder one expects to stand five years from now. Name: Cantril's self anchoring ladder rating of life (original) |
Classification | C-BW-c-sq-l-11-a |
Author's label | Social well-being |
Page in publication | 85-86 |
Finding used in nation ranks | Yes |
On original range 0 - 10 | On range 0 - 10 | |
Mean | 7.29 | |
Standard deviation |
Author's label | Our subject description | |
Gender | show | Sex (male vs female) |
Urban/rural | show | Rural vs urban dwelling |