Study | Jacob & Brinkerhoff (1999): study US 1998 |

Title | Mindfulness and Subjective Well-Being in the Sustainability Movement: A Further Discrepancies Theory. |

Source | Social Indicators Research, 1999, Vol. 46, 341 - 368 |

DOI | DOI: 10.1023/A:1006941403481 |

Public | 'Back to the landers', USA 1998 |

Sample | Non-probability purposive sample |

Non-Response | 41,8 |

Respondents N = | 565 |

Correlate | |

Author's label | Discrepancy: HFP-HP gap |

Page in Source | 358 |

Our classification | Actual realization of lifegoals |

Operationalization | Discrepancy between the actual homestead food production and the selfrated importance of homestead production HFP: percentage of a family's food that the respondents reported was produced on ther mini-homesteads HP: Selfreport on the importance of homestead production: - growing your own food - cutting energy consumption - growing/eating organic food Rated 1 (very important) to 4 (not at all important) GAP: The value scales and performance indexes were dichotomized at their empirical midpoints (medians) and then cross-tabulated with each other. The survey respondents then fell into one of four categories: (1) low values/low performance (“no gap”), (2) high values/low performance (“gap”), (3) low values/high performance (“gap”), and (4) high values/high performance (“no gap”). These gaps (or absence of gaps) are calculated for both performance indicators (TSR Index and HFP) and for each of the three value scales (Country Asceticism, Homestead Production and Ecological Sensitivity). The first step to the comparability of the variables is to normalize each indicator and then place the respondents’ scores along a normalized distribution as t-scores with means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. With respondents possessing comparable scores for each of the key indicators which constitute the values-performance discrepancies, a “gap score” for each value-performance pair was calculated by subtracting normalized performance scores from normalized value scores. To faciliate interpretation they just used a subsample with values higher than the median for Technological Self-Reliance Index (TSR), Country Ascetisism (CA), Homestead Production (HP) and Ecological Sensitivity (ES) for further analysis |

Observed Relation with Happiness | ||

Happiness Measure | Statistics | Elaboration/Remarks |

O-H?-c-sq-v-5-b | r=-.25 p < .005 | |

O-H?-c-sq-v-5-b | Beta=-.20 p < .005 | Beta controlled for - gap: importance of ecological sensitivity / actual use of technology - gap: importance of ecological sensitivity / actual homestead food production - gap: importance of homestead production / actual use of technology - gap: importance of cultural asceticism / actual use of homestead food production |

O-H?-c-sq-v-5-b | Beta=-.14 p < .05 | Beta controlled for - mindfulness - relationships - gap: importance of ecological sensitivity / actual use of technology - time for self - age - homestead food production |

Appendix 1: Happiness measures used

Code | Full Text |

O-H?-c-sq-v-5-b | Selfreport on single question: Lead item not reported. 5 very happy 4 happy 3 neutral 2. unhappy 1 very unhappy |

Appendix 2: Statistics used

Symbol | Explanation |

Beta | STANDARDIZED REGRESSION COEFFICIENT by LEAST SQUARES (OLS) Type: test statistic. Measurement level: Correlates: all metric, Happiness: metric. Range: [-1 ; +1] Meaning: beta > 0 « a higher correlate level corresponds to a higher happiness rating on average. beta < 0 « a higher correlate level corresponds to a higher happiness rating on average. beta = 0 « no correlation. beta = + 1 or -1 « perfect correlation. |

r | PRODUCT-MOMENT CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (Also "Pearson's correlation coefficient' or simply 'correlation coefficient') Type: test statistic. Measurement level: Correlate: metric, Happiness: metric Range: [-1; +1] Meaning: r = 0 « no correlation , r = 1 « perfect correlation, where high correlate values correspond with high happiness values, and r = -1 « perfect correlation, where high correlate values correspond with low happiness values. |

Ruut Veenhoven, World Database of Happiness, Collection of Correlational Findings, Erasmus University Rotterdam.

https://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl