print

Correlational findings

Study Ford et al. (2013): study ZZ Anglo-America 2002

Public
30+ aged, Adventist church atendees, North America 2002-2007
Sample
Respondents
N = 9255
Non Response
45%
Assessment
Questionnaire: Paper & Pencil Interview (PAPI)

Correlate

Authors's Label
Processed meat
Our Classification
Remarks
Assessed usung Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), which contains a list of 200 food items. Processed meat types: processed beef, lamb, chicken or turkey and pork. Intake expressed in standard servings in grams Food intake was energy adjusted using the residual method
Distribution
Males: 0,8, females 0,5
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Selfreported  intake of processed meat during the last year
1  never or rarely
2  1-3 times per month
3  1-6  times per week
4  1-4 times per day

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks A-BW-cy-mq-v-5-d Beta = - s positive affect:  Beta =  -.12 (.021)
negative affect:  Beta =  +.11 (.037)

Beta's controled for:
- age
- gender
- ethnicity
- frequency of vigorous physical activity
- hours sleep
- total energy intake
- use of alcohol

More negative among females