print

Correlational findings

Study Gray et al. (2008a): study TH Thailand North 2005

Public
+ 20 aged, Chai Nai and Kanchnaburi provinces, Thailand, 2005
Survey name
Unnamed study
Sample
Respondents
N = 5360
Non Response
Assessment
Interview: face-to-face

Correlate

Authors's Label
Debt
Our Classification
Remarks
Question not reported
Distribution
Chainat: 0: 60,7%, 1: 13,7 %, 2: 16,4%, 3: 9,1%
Kanchnaburi 0: 63,2% 1: 10,8%, 2: 16,7%, 3: 9,1%
Related specification variables
Operationalization
Self report on having a debt
3 Yes, a very big burden(reference)
2 Yes, a burden to some extent
1 Yes, but not a burden at all
0 None

Observed Relation with Happiness

Happiness Measure Statistics Elaboration / Remarks M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e DM = CHAI NAT
Very big burden        M = 5,0  SD = 2,1
Burden to some extent  M = 5,6  SD = 1,7
Not a burden at all    M = 6,1  SD = 1,7
No debt                M = 5,8  SD = 2,0
M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e b = + p < .001 Yes, a very big burden(ref.)
Yes, a burden to some extent +0.33 (05)
Yes, but not a burden at all +0.40 (05)
None                         +0.62 (001)
M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e = KANCHANABURI
Very big burden        M = 4,6  SD = 2,0
Burden to some extent  M = 5,6  SD = 1,6
Not a burden at all    M = 6,1  SD = 1,6
No debt                M = 5,9  SD = 1,8
M-FH-c-sq-n-11-e b = + p < .001 KANCHANABURI
Yes, a very big burden(ref.)
Yes, a burden to some extent +0.72 (001)
Yes, but not a burden at all +0.91 (001)
None                         +1.01 (001)

b's controlled for:
- age
- gender
- marital status
- education
- income
- house ownership
- perceived neighbourhood quality
- sickness last month
- feeling of relative poverty