print

Happiness Measures

Measures of Happiness: M-FH-g-sq-v-5-d

Characteristics

Code:
M-FH-g-sq-v-5-d
Focus:
Mixed: Feel Happy (M-FH)
Time frame:
generally (g)
Mode:
1 question (sq)
Scale Type:
verbal scale (v)
Scale Range:
5

Description

Self report on single question:

Generally speaking, how happy do you feel?
5  very happy
4  happy
3  so-so
2  not happy
1  not happy at all

List of Studies Using this Measure

Study Population N Mean
Standard Deviation
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Dongcheng , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Dongcheng district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 241
Mean
= 3.315
SD
= 0.761
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Xicheng , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Xicheng district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 326
Mean
= 3.292
SD
= 0.920
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Chongwen , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Chongwen district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 213
Mean
= 3.605
SD
= 0.806
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Xuanwu , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Xuanwu district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 240
Mean
= 3.528
SD
= 0.810
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Chaoyang , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City district of Chaoyang ,beijing, China, 2002 N = 316
Mean
= 3.443
SD
= 0.747
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Fengtai , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Fengtai district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 149
Mean
= 3.397
SD
= 0.867
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Shijingshan , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Shijingshan district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 138
Mean
= 3.502
SD
= 0.881
Shi (2002): study CN City district of Haidian , beijing 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, Haidian district, Beijing, China, 2002 N = 330
Mean
= 3.481
SD
= 0.764
Shi (2002): study CN Taiyuan, shanxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 2002 N = 804
Mean
= 3.678
SD
= 0.815
Shi (2002): study CN Datong, shanxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Datong, Shanxi, China, 2002 N = 355
Mean
= 3.548
SD
= 0.761
Shi (2002): study CN Hunyuan county , datong shanxi 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Hunyuan county , datong shanxi, China, 2002 N = 216
Mean
= 3.212
SD
= 1.149
Shi (2002): study CN Changzhi, shanxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Changzhi, Shanxi, China, 2002 N = 410
Mean
= 3.285
SD
= 0.898
Shi (2002): study CN Yuncheng, shanxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Yuncheng, Shanxi, China, 2002 N = 409
Mean
= 3.500
SD
= 0.839
Shi (2002): study CN Fenyang ,lüliang , shanxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Fenyang ,lüliang , Shanxi, China, 2002 N = 201
Mean
= 3.540
SD
= 0.866
Shi (2002): study CN Xing county,lüliang, shanxi 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Xing county,lüliang,shanxi, China, 2002 N = 209
Mean
= 3.532
SD
= 0.734
Shi (2002): study CN Shenyang, liaoning 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Shenyang,l Liaoning, China, 2002 N = 1022
Mean
= 3.611
SD
= 0.825
Shi (2002): study CN Dalian, liaoning 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Dalian, Liaoning, China, 2002 N = 1036
Mean
= 3.542
SD
= 0.828
Shi (2002): study CN Wafangdian, dalian, liaoning 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Wafangdian,dalian,liaoning, China, 2002 N = 199
Mean
= 3.622
SD
= 0.955
Shi (2002): study CN Jingzhou, hubei 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Jingzhou, Hubei, China, 2002 N = 400
Mean
= 3.703
SD
= 0.755
Shi (2002): study CN Dandong, Changtu county, liaoning 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Dandong, Changtu county, Liaoning, China, 2002 N = 193
Mean
= 3.761
SD
= 0.903
Shi (2002): study CN Nanjing, jiangsu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 598
Mean
= 3.518
SD
= 0.804
Shi (2002): study CN Wuxi, jiangsu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 389
Mean
= 3.570
SD
= 0.848
Shi (2002): study CN yixing city, jiangsu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Yixing Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 179
Mean
= 3.520
SD
= 0.800
Shi (2002): study CN Xuzhou, jiangsu 2002 Adult general public, City of Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 387
Mean
= 3.648
SD
= 0.798
Shi (2002): study CN Nantong, jiangsu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 356
Mean
= 3.494
SD
= 0.829
Shi (2002): study CN Dafeng , yancheng, jiangsu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Dafeng , Yancheng, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 196
Mean
= 3.649
SD
= 0.689
Shi (2002): study CN Yangzhou, jiangsu 2002 Adult general public, City of Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 372
Mean
= 3.615
SD
= 0.896
Shi (2002): study CN Taixing ,taizhou, jiangsu 2002 Adult general public, City of Taixing , Taizhou, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 211
Mean
= 3.694
SD
= 0.674
Shi (2002): study CN Suqian, jiangsu 2002 Adult general public, City of Suqian, Jiangsu, China, 2002 N = 232
Mean
= 3.447
SD
= 0.876
Shi (2002): study CN Hefei, anhui 2002 Adult general public, City of Hefei, Anhui, China, 2002 N = 393
Mean
= 3.431
SD
= 0.768
Shi (2002): study CN Wuhu, anhui 2002 Adult general public, City of Wuhu, Anhui, China, 2002 N = 381
Mean
= 4.123
SD
= 1.038
Shi (2002): study CN Bengbu, anhui 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Bengbu, Anhui, China, 2002 N = 413
Mean
= 3.554
SD
= 0.815
Shi (2002): study CN Huainan, anhui 2002 Adult general public, City of Huainan, Anhui, China, 2002 N = 402
Mean
= 3.478
SD
= 0.836
Shi (2002): study CN She county, Tongcheng, anhui 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, She county,Tongcheng, anhui, China, 2002 N = 201
Mean
= 3.618
SD
= 0.847
Shi (2002): study CN Bozhou,anhui 2002 Adult general public, City of Bozhou, Anhui, China, 2002 N = 200
Mean
= 3.542
SD
= 0.865
Shi (2002): study CN Zhengzhou, Henan 2002 Adult general public, City of Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2002 N = 798
Mean
= 3.533
SD
= 0.887
Shi (2002): study CN Kaifeng, enan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Kaifeng, Henan, China, 2002 N = 418
Mean
= 3.524
SD
= 0.831
Shi (2002): study CN Hua county, Anyang, henan 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Hua county, Anyang, henan, China, 2002 N = 212
Mean
= 3.726
SD
= 0.860
Shi (2002): study CN Xinxiang, henan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Xinxiang, Henan, China, 2002 N = 399
Mean
= 3.620
SD
= 0.660
Shi (2002): study CN Hui county, Xinxiang, henan 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Hui county, Xinxiang, henan, China, 2002 N = 229
Mean
= 3.781
SD
= 0.945
Shi (2002): study CN Xiangcheng county, Xuchang, henan 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public,Xiangcheng county, Xuchang, henan, China, 2002 N = 194
Mean
= 3.470
SD
= 0.835
Shi (2002): study CN Gushi county, Xinyang, henan 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Gushi county,Xinyang, henan, China, 2002 N = 192
Mean
= 3.594
SD
= 0.979
Shi (2002): study CN Wuhan, hubei 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2002 N = 1015
Mean
= 3.390
SD
= 0.818
Shi (2002): study CN Yichang, hubei 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Yichang, Hubei, China, 2002 N = 356
Mean
= 3.356
SD
= 0.962
Shi (2002): study CN Xiangyang, hubei 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Xiangyang, Hubei, China, 2002 N = 401
Mean
= 3.333
SD
= 0.907
Shi (2002): study CN Honghu, jingzhou, hubei 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Honghu, Jingzhou, Hubei, China, 2002 N = 212
Mean
= 3.147
SD
= 0.904
Shi (2002): study CN Xishui county, Huanggang, hubei 2002 Adults, age range not reported, general public, Xishui county, Huanggang, hubei, China, 2002 N = 189
Mean
= 3.201
SD
= 1.077
Shi (2002): study CN Xianning, hubei 2002 Adult general public, City of Xianning,h Hubei, China, 2002 N = 202
Mean
= 3.284
SD
= 1.033
Shi (2002): study CN Guangzhou, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 808
Mean
= 3.443
SD
= 0.792
Shi (2002): study CN Shaoguan, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Shaoguan, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 204
Mean
= 3.200
SD
= 0.897
Shi (2002): study CN Foshan, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Foshan, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 205
Mean
= 3.584
SD
= 0.835
Shi (2002): study CN Shunde, foshan, guangdong 2002 Adult general public, City of Shunde,foshan, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 233
Mean
= 3.388
SD
= 0.690
Shi (2002): study CN Zhanjiang, guangdong 2002 Adult general public, City of Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 218
Mean
= 3.326
SD
= 0.988
Shi (2002): study CN Zhaoqing, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Zhaoqing, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 212
Mean
= 3.286
SD
= 0.905
Shi (2002): study CN Huizhou, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Huizhou, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 218
Mean
= 4.346
SD
= 0.744
Shi (2002): study CN Puning, jieyang, guangdong 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Puning, Jieyang, Guangdong, China, 2002 N = 240
Mean
= 3.683
SD
= 0.576
Shi (2002): study CN Chongqin 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public,City of Chongqin, China, 2002 N = 799
Mean
= 3.473
SD
= 0.831
Shi (2002): study CN Wanzhou, chongqin 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Wanzhou,chongqin, China, 2002 N = 332
Mean
= 3.598
SD
= 0.909
Shi (2002): study CN Chengdu, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 787
Mean
= 3.582
SD
= 0.920
Shi (2002): study CN Luzhou, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Luzhou, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 390
Mean
= 3.711
SD
= 0.772
Shi (2002): study CN Guangyuan, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Guangyuan, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 390
Mean
= 3.469
SD
= 0.735
Shi (2002): study CN Neijiang, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Neijiang, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 195
Mean
= 3.187
SD
= 0.877
Shi (2002): study CN Emeishan, leshan, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Emeishan,leshan, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 188
Mean
= 3.539
SD
= 0.904
Shi (2002): study CN Nanchong, sichuan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Nanchong, Sichuan, China, 2002 N = 371
Mean
= 4.135
SD
= 1.050
Shi (2002): study CN Kunming, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Kunming, Yunnan, China, 2002 N = 398
Mean
= 3.394
SD
= 0.984
Shi (2002): study CN Nanning, guangxi 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Nanning, Guangxi, China, 2002 N = 363
Mean
= 3.322
SD
= 0.820
Shi (2002): study CN Xuanwei, qujing, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Xuanwei, Qujing, Yunnan, China, 2002 N = 195
Mean
= 3.143
SD
= 0.753
Shi (2002): study CN Baoshan, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges, age range not reported, general public, City of Baoshan, Yunnan, China, 2002 N = 376
Mean
= 3.296
SD
= 0.740
Shi (2002): study CN Gejiu, yunan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Gejiu, Yunan, China, 2002 N = 368
Mean
= 3.012
SD
= 0.900
Shi (2002): study CN Simao, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Simao, Yunnan, China, 2002 N = 190
Mean
= 3.206
SD
= 0.779
Shi (2002): study CN Dali, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Dali,yunnan, China, 2002 N = 403
Mean
= 3.702
SD
= 0.715
Shi (2002): study CN Ljiang, yunnan 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Ljiang, Yunnan, China, 2002 N = 226
Mean
= 3.843
SD
= 0.971
Shi (2002): study CN Lanzhou, gansu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 2002 N = 798
Mean
= 3.496
SD
= 0.835
Shi (2002): study CN Weiwu, weiwu, gansu 2002 Adults, varying age ranges general public, City of Weiwu,weiwu, Gansu, China, 2002 N = 398
Mean
= 3.376
SD
= 0.955
Shi (2002): study CN Pingliang, gansu 2002 Adult general public, City of Pingliang, Gansu, China, 2002 N = 399
Mean
= 3.203
SD
= 0.929
Liu & Shang (2012): study CN 2002 Adult general public, urban areas, China, 2002 N = 2304
Mean
= 3.485
SD
= 0.855